Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Questions
Some of you at our last ward meeting shared some questions and concerns that you have. Here are some of the answers I have received.
Keith Majors is sending letters to homeowners and trimming trees which extend onto Emeis Drive.
A possible change in the snow route on Linwood will appear on the next cycle.
The following is a response to a question on staffing from Police Chief Michael Bladel:
To give you some perspective of the shifting of staff in the PD during the last 5 years, I was able to find a memo responding to a similar request by your past 2nd Ward Alderman, George Nickolas, who made the request at a Committee of the Whole meeting held on December 12, 2002. Using that response as a "baseline" here are the changes in the PD's staffing assignments since 2002:
2002/159POs* 2006/160POs
Numbers/Percentage** Numbers/Percentage**
Sworn Personnel
in support of Field 96 / 60% 102 / 64%
Uniformed Operations:
Criminal Investigations: 42 / 26% 38 / 24%
Support Services, (NETS)***,
and Community Policing: 17 / 11% 17 / 11%
Administration: 4 / 3% 3 / 2%
Be advised that this is a breakdown of only sworn personnel. However, the organizational chart does show that: the Police Department has flattened its rank structure (compared to a 2002 chart) by eliminating two command positions and adding those positions back in at the Officer level, that civilian positions were added in support of our officers in the field, that more supervisors are being assigned back to field duties and that the primary trend continues to be focused on The Uniform Patrol Division.
* Difference in percentages are the result of rounding
** Percentages based only on sworn personnel. In 2002 159 Sworn Officers probably reflected 2 openings as the original number
of sworn officers before the start of the budget cuttings was 161
***NETS Officers work primarily in the field, in 2002 a number of these positions were assigned to our schools in the DARE program
I will report future answers as I receive them.
Shawn Hamerlinck
Keith Majors is sending letters to homeowners and trimming trees which extend onto Emeis Drive.
A possible change in the snow route on Linwood will appear on the next cycle.
The following is a response to a question on staffing from Police Chief Michael Bladel:
To give you some perspective of the shifting of staff in the PD during the last 5 years, I was able to find a memo responding to a similar request by your past 2nd Ward Alderman, George Nickolas, who made the request at a Committee of the Whole meeting held on December 12, 2002. Using that response as a "baseline" here are the changes in the PD's staffing assignments since 2002:
2002/159POs* 2006/160POs
Numbers/Percentage** Numbers/Percentage**
Sworn Personnel
in support of Field 96 / 60% 102 / 64%
Uniformed Operations:
Criminal Investigations: 42 / 26% 38 / 24%
Support Services, (NETS)***,
and Community Policing: 17 / 11% 17 / 11%
Administration: 4 / 3% 3 / 2%
Be advised that this is a breakdown of only sworn personnel. However, the organizational chart does show that: the Police Department has flattened its rank structure (compared to a 2002 chart) by eliminating two command positions and adding those positions back in at the Officer level, that civilian positions were added in support of our officers in the field, that more supervisors are being assigned back to field duties and that the primary trend continues to be focused on The Uniform Patrol Division.
* Difference in percentages are the result of rounding
** Percentages based only on sworn personnel. In 2002 159 Sworn Officers probably reflected 2 openings as the original number
of sworn officers before the start of the budget cuttings was 161
***NETS Officers work primarily in the field, in 2002 a number of these positions were assigned to our schools in the DARE program
I will report future answers as I receive them.
Shawn Hamerlinck
Comments:
<< Home
Alderman Hamerlinck: Great job tonight on speaking out for holding on to the strategic property on 53rd Street. Something shady is going on there as far as the bidding and dollar amounts. This land is worth far more than what is currently being offered regardless of the appraisal that was given.
Good job and we thank you for all of the time and energy that you put into looking out for Davenport's residents.
Good job and we thank you for all of the time and energy that you put into looking out for Davenport's residents.
Perhaps Shawn the DOC should look at buying the 53rd land to build. It seems to me that area of town shouldbe doing their fair share in taking on some of Davenport's ever growing social service providing. Those of us in the central part of town have carried the burden for long enough and the land seems to be cheap. Heck - perhaps the city should approach other housing agencies for the development of low income housing that people keep saying we need so much. How would that go over do you think?
Post a Comment
<< Home
